Recent Developments in Immigration

Updates from the Minister for Justice and Equality

On the 16th September 2014, Minister Fitzgerald announced new plans to increase the number of civilians carrying out key immigration functions in border management and registration roles. These jobs are currently within the purview of An Garda Siochana but as part of the Minister’s push to get more Gardai out on the streets, these roles are expected to be undertaken by an additional 80 civilian staff. The new programme will see civilians carrying out checks at both Dublin Airport terminals, as well as the transfer of the immigration permission registration function from An Garda Siochana to the Irish Naturalisation and Immigration Service of the Department of Justice and Equality (INIS). The Minister noted that the Gardai “will continue to provide core policing functions at the Airport and support the civilian staff as appropriate”. The full text of the Minister’s press release can be found at: <http://www.inis.gov.ie/en/INIS/Pages/Minister%20Fitzgerald%20announces%20major%20immigration%20civilianisation%20initiative>

On the 2nd September 2014, the Minister announced major reforms of the student immigration and international education sector. This move comes in the wake of a number of private college closures this year. The reforms aim to protect the interests of genuine students, while reducing instances whereby the immigration system can be abused. A recent policy statement sets out three primary pillars of reform: only accredited programmes will be in a position to enrol international students, inspection will be increased to ensure education and immigration standards are maintained, and the non-EEA student work concession will be altered to mitigate abuse. In the course of her statement, Minister Fitzgerald also warned those students affected by college closures earlier in 2014 to regularise their status in the State and ensure they were abiding by current immigration laws. The full text of the Minister’s press release, along with links to the policy statement of the Task Force, can be found at: <http://www.inis.gov.ie/en/INIS/Pages/Ministers%20O%E2%80%99Sullivan%20and%20Fitzgerald%20launch%20major%20reform%20of%20student%20immigration%20and%20the%20international%20education%20sector>

Proposed reforms of Direct Provision Centres

Following increased media reportage into conditions in the State’s Direct Provision centres, in mid-August the Minister for Justice announced that a working group was to be established in the coming month to review the current system. The main issues outlined by the Minister include welfare payments, third-level education access, and support for children. Although Minister Fitzgerald has promised a more efficient application process would be in place by midway through 2015, she also ruled out the possibility of an absolute extension of the right to work to asylum seekers, citing the country’s unemployment issues as cause. While the establishment of a working group has been praised as a positive development by UN agencies, in more recent days that Minister has warned against “unrealistic expectations” in terms of reform. At present some 4,330 adults and children are being housed in Direct Provision centres around the country. Pressure is mounting on the Government to improve living standards, with recent weeks seeing asylum seekers protesting the system and calling for an end to Direct Provision entirely. Full articles on the above can be found at: The Irish Times “Government to review conditions for asylum seekers” 12th August 2014 <http://www.irishtimes.com/news/social-affairs/government-to-review-conditions-for-asylum-seekers-1.1894079> The Irish Times “Minister warns against unrealistic expectations on direct provison” 25th September 2014 <http://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/oireachtas/minister-warns-against-unrealistic-expectations-on-direct-provision-1.1940425> The Irish Times “Asylum seekers mount protest at Cork direct provision centre” 15th September 2014 <http://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/asylum-seekers-mount-protest-at-cork-direct-provision-centre-1.1929294>

Immigration, Residence and Protection Bill 2010

As part of her pledge to speed up the asylum process in the coming year, Minister Fitzgerald has committed to the introduction of a Single Procedure Mechanism, as distinct from the provisions of the currently dormant Immigration, Residence and Protection Bill. The Single Procedure Mechanism would allow claims for asylum and subsidiary protection to be made simultaneously. At present, claimants must first seek asylum, regardless of whether they meet the stringent criteria for refugee status. This procedure could theoretically save claimants years of waiting, and has been campaigned for by numerous organisations including the Irish Refugee Council and NASC. Publications and press releases on the above can be found at: “Press release: NASC welcomes renewed government commitment to reform of direct provision” 12 August 2014 <http://www.nascireland.org/latest-news/press-release-nasc-welcomes-renewed-government-commitment-reform-direct-provision/> “Roadmap for Asylum Reform” < http://irc.fusio.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Roadmap-for-Asylum-Reform2.pdf> 


Brophy Solicitors

EU STATES GRANTED PROTECTION TO OVER 100,000 ASYLUM SEEKERS IN 2012

Asylum decisions in the EU27 Member States granted over 100,000 asylum seekers protection in 2012.

The EU 27 Member States granted protection to 102, 700 asylum seekers in 2013, compared with 84,300 in 2011. The largest groups of beneficiaries of protection status were citizens from Syria, Afghanistan and Somalia.

Ireland had a total of 1625 decisions; of these 935 were first instance and 690 were final decisions on appeal. The largest groups granted protection status were from Syria (the Irish Government recently announced an extra €1.6 million of government funding for Syrian refugees which will be divided between Concern, Goal and Oxfam for the provision of humanitarian assistance), Somalia and Pakistan.

The total of positive decisions amounted to only 140; 115 of which were refugee status and only 30 constituted Subsidiary Protection. There were no successful decisions in relation to Humanitarian Leave. 

The EU average approval rate equates to 25.2%. Ireland unfortunately has the significantly lower rate of 8.6%.

These statistics, especially in comparison to some of our European neighbours, highlights the need for an overhaul of the refugee system in Ireland. The significantly below average approval again underlines the serious problems in the decision making process. 

Furthermore, the low success rate for subsidiary protection further emphasises the need to amend our subsidiary protection procedure so it is in line with that of the other EU Member States.

To see the statistics concerning all Member states follow the below link: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_STAT-13-96_en.htm?locale=en

Brophy Solicitors

Asylum children in 'extreme poverty'

Brophy Solicitors would like to take this opportunity to commend the IRC (Irish Refugee Council) on their report into the living conditions of young adults and children in direct provision accommodation within the State.

The report was published today and highlights issues which arise with direct accommodation for asylum seekers. The report found that there were numerous reports of malnutrition amongst young women and expectant mothers.

Within its report the IRC highlighted one particular case from a Mayo accommodation center that once a child reached six months, no more baby or toddler foods would be provided and the children would only be supplied with food “consistent with the rest of the residents”.

Brophy Solicitors

18.09.12

http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2012/0918/breaking39.html

Shatter defers closure of Galway asylum-seeker centre

We recently reported about the order to close down an asylum-seeker centre in Galway, entitled the Lisbrook Centre (incorrectly referenced in the article as the Lisburn Centre). The Minister for Justice Alan Shatter has deferred this closing order so that he may review the motivations, reports the Irish Times in an article from Thursday, 13^th September.

In earlier articles about the issue, authorities have reported that the centre was ordered to be closed because of a falling number of asylum seekers requiring accommodation in the State, and budgets were tight. However, that does not change the fact that there are still hundreds of asylum seekers depending on direct accommodation facilities such as the Lisbrook Centre while they wait for the determination of their application. The article reports that some have waited for up to four years on the determination of their application, and many have moved up to nine times as they await a decision.

School has just started and many young asylum seekers have begun studying at a local school. They have just settled in and hope to integrate, and the Labour Galway West TD Derek Nolan cited the closure as a “terrible way to treat people.”

Local residents who support the maintenance of the Lisbrook Centre have heavily criticized the closure decision, and they intend to move forward with the planned rally in Galway on Saturday.

Hopefully the Minister reviews the decision to close the centre and quashes it, allowing many refugees who have already suffered unimaginable trials a renewed sense of welcome and security in the State.

14.09.12

http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2012/0913/1224323959445.html

Bernardo’s chief: in the best interests of the children

An article from Tuesday, 11^th September in the UK Guardian described the efforts of Anne Marie Carrie, the chief of Barnardo’s. It is an accommodation centre for families who have been refused asylum and are waiting to be deported back to their home countries. She says that her organization comes under fire often, from anti child detention organizations, but she claims that keeping the children with their families, even if it is in a detention centre, is far better than the alternative, which is to split up the families as they wait and send the children to foster homes to await deportation.

She also acts as a crucial voice for these families, as their rights are commonly ignored. She is unafraid to call the necessary authorities to ensure that the rights of the families are looked after, even though the State has denied them official protection. “If not us, then who?” she commonly asks.

Barnardo’s is a service at Cedars, the “pre-departure accommodation centre” that provides accommodation for failed asylum seekers. At the onset, Barnardo’s established a set of “red lines” that could not be crossed regarding the rights of refugees. Once crossed, Carrie took action. She raises concerns every time she believes the rights of refugees have been breached, and her voice is a valuable one to these vulnerable families.

Brophy Solicitors

12.09.12

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/sep/11/barnardos-chief-social-care-asylum-seekers

Closure of asylum seeker centre criticised

An article in the Irish Times from Monday, 10^th September, discussed the closure of the Lisbrook centre, formerly the Ibis Hotel, which accommodates several hundred asylum seekers and their families. These families are now set to be relocated to other refugee accommodation centres around Ireland, but the individual relocation sites have yet to be determined.

This closure puts an already vulnerable population at additional risk. Refugees who were housed at the Lisbrook centre have endured many trials in their journey to Ireland, and they settled at the centre with the hopes that they could begin anew in Ireland. Now, as the families face uprooting, parents are worried about their children having to switch schools, communities face the loss of neighbours, and weary refugees have to face yet another move. The closure happening in mid-September shows additional lack of consideration for school children who may be already settled into a new school.

Many of the refugees were too frightened to have their names quoted in the newspaper, but they anonymously reported “serious trauma,” especially since some of them have already spent time in eight different provision centres. They were hoping to finally settle down in Lisbrook, only to find that they had to relocate once again.

The community in Galway is outraged as well. Labour TD for Galway West, Derek Nolan, said it’s a “terrible way to treat people,” and he promised to contact the Department of Justice to discover why the centre has been closed. The information provided to the refugees about their future provisions is frustratingly vague so many families are still left questioning what the future holds for them. The criticism that has risen as a result of this closure should demonstrate to the Department of Justice, and the Reception and Integration Agency, the organization responsible for direct provision accommodation, that a more stable living situation is crucial for this population of asylum seekers.

An article from 11^th September describes how an anti-racist group has appealed to Mr Alan Shatter, Minister for Justice, to review and hopefully quash the decision to close the centre. The Department have stated that “Lisbrook is closing as part of an ‘ongoing consolidation’ of accommodation for asylum seekers across the State.” However, an organization against Galway called “Residents Against Racism” has appealed to the Minister to review the decision to close the centre.

Brophy Solicitors

11.09.12

http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2012/0910/1224323799097.html

http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2012/0911/1224323846858.html

CASE STUDY – SOMALI ASYLUM SEEKERS AND DILEMMA FACING DECISION MAKERS - QFC, AMC v RAT, MJELR, (2012) IEHC 4

Justice Cooke recently granted leave to seek a judicial review in respect of a negative asylum decision on the basis of the decision maker’s failure to assess the possibility of future persecution open to asylum seekers if returned to Somalia.  Asylum was refused to the Applicant as result of credibility findings but Justice Cooke noted the dilemma that faces decision makers in cases where credibility issues arise but the applicant is also from an undeniably dangerous country. 

Justice Cooke held that, “any decision maker faced with a claim for asylum based upon a risk of persecution of any applicant who is accepted as being from Somalia must proceed with extreme caution and must reject a claim upon grounds of lack of personal credibility only when it is compellingly necessary to do so.”

The judge held that the fact that the Applicant had a child with a man who was not her husband could lead to persecution if she was returned to Somalia. The lack of credibility with regard to past persecution did not exclude the possibility of future persecution. He held that “the particular story told by the asylum seeker may correctly be disbelieved but it may yet be important to examine the possibility that the person in question may nevertheless have a valid Convention based reason for being unable or unwilling to return to the country of origin especially where it is known to be a place of internal conflict or of prevalent violence.”  

You can read the full judgement here.

New body of case law prohibiting Dublin 2 returns to certain Member States

Since the Court of Justice judgements in the “Greek Transfer” cases (see NS and Others v SSHD (C-411/10) and in MSS v Belgium and Greece) in 2011, Members States are now effectively prohibited from applying the Dublin 2 Regulations in order to return asylum seekers to Greece. Following on from these judgements, it is not surprising that a body of case law is now developing to challenge Dublin 2 returns to other Member States with poor records in respect of the treatment of asylum applicants.

In December 2011, we blogged about the Austrian Courts prohibiting Dublin 2 returns to Hungary due to the potential risks of a breach of Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – which prohibits torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.  Relying on these judgements we have been able to secure an undertaking from the Department of Justice not to deport a client of this office to Hungary.

We now wish to highlight some further decisions coming from the Belgian courts which suspend Dublin 2 returns to Malta for similar reasons. The Belgian Court’s decision, of the 6^th  January 2012, found that the applicant, of Somali nationality, had demonstrated an arguable claim based on Article 3 of the ECHR that he would be subject to inhuman treatment were he to be returned to Malta and thus suspended the execution of the State Secretary’s decision.  The judgement is written in Dutch and summarized briefly in English by the UNHCR. 

Summary of Belgian court’s judgement;

The applicant had previously applied for asylum in the Netherlands, but had been returned by that country to Malta in 2010 pursuant to the Dublin Regulation.  He alleged that in Malta, he was left homeless and that, due to his failure to be provided with legal aid, his asylum request had not been properly considered.  The applicant then requested asylum in Belgium on 27 October 2011, which the State Secretary for Asylum and Migration, Social Integration and Poverty Reduction refused to examine and then ordered his renewed transfer to Malta on 21 December 2011. The applicant, who was detained and scheduled to be transferred on 9 January 2012, requested suspension of the execution of the State Secretary’s decision under extremely urgent procedure on 5 January 2012. 

Citing the report of Mr Thomas Hammarburg  - Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe – dated 9^th June 2011, the Belgian Court found that there were significant deficiencies with Malta’s detention policy regarding asylum-seekers and the living conditions in the detention centres, as well as clear shortcomings with respect to Malta’s asylum proceedings concerning legal aid and the asylum proceedings, partly caused by the detention policy. The Court found that the Belgian authorities should have been aware of these shortcomings and taken them into consideration in their decision to refuse to consider the applicant’s asylum request and transfer him back to Malta and which they failed to disprove in written pleadings.

Mr Thomas Hammarburg’s report identifies many concerns regarding Malta’s policies in respect of asylum seekers. 

Brophy Solictors

24.02.12 

Council of Europe report on situation in Malta for asylum seekers, June 2011

The Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe – Mr Thomas Hammarburg  - has recently published a report detailing the Council’s concerns regarding the situation of asylum seekers in Malta. The  report, dated 9^th June 2011, identifies the following concerns regarding Malta’s detention policy:

-         It provides for mandatory administrative detention for all arriving migrants, including asylum seekers.  The Commissioner recommended that Malta should provide for “the presumption in favour of liberty under national law, and establish a framework for the implementation of alternatives to detention.”

-         Malta has failed to comply with ECHR July 2010 judgment in Louled Massoud, which found a violation of Art 5 in relation to detention of an asylum seeker, whose claim had been rejected for almost 18 months.  The Commissioner recommended that “speedy and effective remedies” should be available to migrants to challenge their detention.

The report identified the following concerns regarding the living conditions in the detention and open centres:

-         The Commissioner noted that living conditions in open centres, where migrants released from detention are housed, vary substantially, with adequate arrangements in smaller centres that cater for some vulnerable groups (families with children, pregnant women, unaccompanied minors) and “far more difficult” conditions in the bigger centres.  The Commissioner found one such tent village in a larger centre “clearly inadequate” even for short periods of time and recommended it be closed.  He also noted that conditions had reportedly deteriorated at another complex housing vulnerable groups since the Commissioner’s visit following new arrivals from Libya. 

-         Re: vulnerable groups— the Commissioner noted that Malta’s policy of mandatory detention of members of vulnerable groups was “at variance with international standards,” which provide that such measures should only be used as a measure of last resort, and that he was concerned about the lengthy period of time unaccompanied minors and people with disabilities or serious physical or mental problems spend as a result of the lengthy procedures for establishing their vulnerability.  The Commissioner also noted that these smaller facilities that house vulnerable groups often become full so that members of these groups, including those returned from other EU countries under the Dublin Regulations often end up in the bigger centres that “are totally inadequate for this purpose.”

The report also expressed concern, with respect to legal aid and asylum proceedings, that despite some progress in this area, Malta needs to provide legal aid and improve access to case files for asylum seekers and their representatives and the motivation behind asylum decisions.

The Commissioner, who had found that the system in place to support migrants “currently perpetuates their social exclusion and leaves them at serious risk of destitution,” recommended that Malta make available financial support and social assistance to all beneficiaries of international protection in Malta, rather than limiting financial assistance to those living in the detention centres.   With respect to the Commissioner’s concern about reportedly prevalent racism and xenophobia against migrants in Malta, he recommended that the government do more in terms of developing a “robust public information strategy to favour [migrants’] local integration.”

Brophy Solicitors 

24.02.12 

Opening of the Irish Refugee Council Law Centre

Congratulations to the Irish Refugee Council (IRC) on the official opening of their new independent Law Centre!

The President of Ireland, Michael D Higgins, last Friday formally launched the IRC Law Centre together with the European Database on Asylum Law at a very well-attended event at the Distillery Building. The Law Centre currently employs two solicitors and two legal officers. It aims to provide early legal advice to asylum seekers in the initial stages of the asylum process. The service can be reached through an outreach clinic, contacting the centre directly, or referrals from other organisations.

In his address, President Michael D referred to the protection gap and unmet need for legal advice for asylum seekers that the Law Centre seeks to fill. The President referred to his own previous and extensive experience as a TD dealing with numerous constituents who were facing difficulties with the immigration process.

Our own experience is that asylum claims are often poorly investigated and presented at the early stages, which leads to the need for further legal challenges later. This impacts negatively both on the applicants, who often wait a very many years for a final outcome, and on the courts system, which has become overburdened with unresolved asylum claims.

We anticipate that the Law Centre will provide valuable advice and support to applicants at the earliest stages of the process and help ensure that such claims are properly presented and future delays kept to a minimum.

We wish the Centre every success!

Brophy Solicitors

19.02.12