DELAYS WITH STAMP 2 RENEWAL APPLICATIONS

We have been dealing with several queries from students who are attempting to resolve their immigration matters through correspondence with the Student Review Group, but are experiencing significant delays in receiving a response. 

Students are generally unable to renew their permission with GNIB and are referred to Student Review Group at the Irish Naturalisation and Immigration Service (INIS) when they have a significant gap in their immigration permission or if there is an issue with their attendance. A specific Student Taskforce has been set up with a dedicated information webpage for the large number of students affected by the recent college closures. Details can be found here: http://www.studenttaskforce.ie/

Our own experience is that students are facing excessive delays in having applications to the Student Review Group (SRG) processed. In one such case we are dealing with, the student was required by GNIB to apply to Student Review Group after his college incorrectly reported his attendance to the GNIB. He has now been waiting one year and nine months for a decision and has faced serious difficulties supporting himself financially during this period as he has been undocumented and without permission to work. We are now in correspondence with the SRG on his behalf trying to resolve the matter and have threatened to issue High Court proceedings if we do not receive a decision on his case in the next seven days. 

In such cases, it is important that students do not simply cease studying when their permission expires and while their applications are being processed by Student Review Group. The basis on which Stamp 2 is issued is after all study, and if the student is no longer fulfilling the conditions of their stay, it may be open to Student Review Group to refuse a renewal application, even if there is a long delay in them issuing that decision. Students will generally be required to show their continued good attendance at college together with evidence of in date private medical insurance. 

Rebecca Keatinge

Brophy Solicitors 

ZAMBRANO UPDATE

 APPLICANTS FROM OUTSIDE THE STATE

We have made a number of applications for fathers of Irish citizen children residing outside the State to join their Irish citizen children in Ireland.  The procedure necessarily involves an application to the appropriate Irish Embassy for a long-stay visa to enter the State.  The delays on such applications have already been considerable and yesterday we received  notification from an Irish Embassy confirming that because we had raised ‘Zambrano type submissions,’ in our application for a long-stay visa for the father of an Irish child, the matter would be sent for ‘further investigation’ to the offices of the Department of Justice and Equality in Dublin.   The note concluded that as there have been large numbers of applications submitted in light of the Zambrano judgement it may be some time before there is a decision on these cases.

It therefore appears that Visa Offices outside the State are taking roughly two to three months to review applications before sending the same application for further investigation to Dublin.  We have been told by the Visa Office in INIS that they will take a further 2 months to conclude their investigations, but in reality are taking longer again. Surely this delay is unjustified!

We might remind the Minister about his Statement he released on the 27^th April 2011.  We include the link<http://www.inis.gov.ie/en/INIS/Pages/PB11000004> to this Statement but you will find that it has expired as the statement has been removed from the INIS website.  Luckily we saved a copy of the Statement on our files.   Parents of Irish citizen children ‘outside the State’ were listed as one of the definitive eligible categories of applicants designated by the Minister following the Zambrano decision.  The Minister was very clear in his note below that applicants outside the State should apply to a local Embassy/Consulate and provide documentation showing a ‘clear link to the Zambrano judgement.’  It appears that problems have arisen within the Department concerning this category of applicants and further information has not been provided to date.

It is interesting that Department subsequently (some time around the 12^th July 2011) released revised guidelines in respect of eligibility for “Zambrano Applications”. See the following question and answer currently posted on the INIS website (http://www.inis.gov.ie/en/INIS/Pages/WP11000038);

Question 3

“I am a non-EEA national. I lived in Ireland for some years but left some time ago to return to my country of origin. I left voluntarily and was never the subject of a Deportation Order. I am the parent of an Irish born citizen child. Can I rely on the Zambrano Judgment to allow me to reside in Ireland?

Response 3

No. The Zambrano Judgment does not apply to any person who left Ireland of their own volition. Such persons can, of course, apply for a visitor or study visa to visit Ireland but cannot rely on the Zambrano Judgment as a basis to obtain a right of residence in Ireland.”

This statement appears to be in direct contradiction to the Minster’s earlier statements in April 2011. We regard the position to be somewhat different to the Minister’s current very restrictive interpretation of the Zambrano judgement. We submit that the rights upon which a parent of an Irish citizen can rely arises from the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union, including in particular Article 18, Article 20 and Article 21. We would highlight that while the ECJ cases such as Zambrano and Zhu and Chen are certainly very relevant to the Applicant’s situation, the judgements are not in themselves the primary source of law upon which the Applicant relies - which is the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union.  We submit therefore that the Minister’s apparent exclusion of the parents of Irish citizen’s not resident in the State is not in accordance with EU Law.

We continue to submit applications for visa/residency for parents outside the State who wish to join or re-join their Irish citizen children residing in the State.  It is unfortunate that many of these applicants were deported shortly before the Zambrano decision came through.  They have now spent several months apart from their families with the prospect of now having to wait for a further considerable period until their applications have been decided.  We call upon the Minister to immediately review his position in light of his earlier comments.

Brophy Solicitors

24.08.11

Significant Development in Irish Immigration Law - Decision in Zambrano

MAJOR DEVELOPMENT IN THE APPLICATION OF EU TREATY RIGHTS LAW –ZAMBRANO V OFFICE NATIONAL DE L’EMPLOI

The European Court of Justice has just delivered a judgement - Case C-34/0 Ruiz Zambrano v Office National De L'Emploi - which will have major implications in respect of the right to reside for non EEA family members of Union Citizens within the territory of their own national State. Until now, Union Citizens could only exercise their EU Treaty Rights on moving from one to another Member State, hence the body of law which developed became known as “Free Movement Law”.

Mr Ruiz Zambrano and his wife, both Colombian nationals, applied for asylum in Belgium due to the civil war in Colombia. The Belgian authorities refused to grant them refugee status and ordered them to leave Belgium. The couple continued to reside in Belgium while awaiting applications to regularise their status. Mr Ruiz Zambrano's wife gave birth to two children who acquired Belgian nationality. At the time of birth of the children, Mr Zambrano was financially self-sufficient. He later became unemployed and was refused unemployment benefits because the Belgian authorities found that he did not comply with the foreigners' residence requirements under national legislation. Mr and Mrs Ruiz Zambrano were also refused residency application in their capacity as ascendants of Belgian nationals.

Proceedings were issued on behalf of Mr and Mrs Zambrano, and a reference was made to the European Court of Justice seeking clarification on whether the Zambranos could rely on rely on European Union law to reside and work in Belgium on the basis of their parentage to Union citizen children who have never exercised their rights to free movement.

The ECJ confirmed that as Union citizens, the Zambrano children enjoyed the fundamental status of nationals of the Member States. The ECJ confirmed that European Union law precludes national measures, which have the effect of depriving citizens of the Union of the genuine enjoyment of the substance of the rights conferred by virtue of their status as citizens of the Union. The ECJ held that if the Belgium authorities refused a right of residence and work to Mr and Mrs Zambrano, this would in effect deprive their dependant Union citizen children of their fundament rights to reside within the European Union, as they would be obliged to leave Belgium with their parents.

In summary, the ECJ held that as follows;

“Citizenship of the Union requires a Member State to allow third country nationals who are parents of a child, who is a national of that Member State, to reside and work there, where a refusal to do so would deprive that child of the genuine enjoyment of the substance of the rights attaching to the status of citizen of the Union. This requirement applies even when the child has never exercised his right to free movement within the territory of the Member State.”

The implications of this judgement are potentially very wide ranging. The ECJ’s reasoning can be applied to all domestic law cases whereby Union citizens are seeking residence permission for their family members or dependants within their own national State. Thus, Irish citizens may now seek to rely on a huge body of European legislation and caselaw in respect of the right to be joined and reside with family members, such law having previously been deemed to be extraneous to their case. Many deportation orders against parents of Irish citizen children may have to be reconsidered, including deportations which have already been effected. Similarly, visa applications in respect of family members of Irish citizens may no longer be regarded to be at the absolute discretion of the Minister for Justice. Previously refused visa applications may require review. 

The next year will certainly be an interesting one in the field of Irish Immigration Law! We look forward to hearing your thoughts and questions on this important development.

Karen Berkeley, Brophy Solicitors

10.03.11