After the Supreme Court’s judgement
in the case of Mallak v The Minister for Justice and Equality (see blog postdated 7th December 2012),
the question continues to arise when can the Minister legally deny an applicant for Naturalization the grounds
upon which his/her application has been refused.
On the 13th December
2012, Minster for Justice, Equity Alan Shatter was asked by was of
Parliamentary question what measures the Minister would take to ensure
transparency and fairness in light of the Mallak judgement. Further, he was
asked whether a review mechanism would be put in place for cases similar to
Mallak’s- for persons who had been refused citizenship without being giving a
reason. Minister Shatter responded as follows;
If the Minister is going to continue
refusing to disclose reasons in justified circumstances, the question of course
arises, what constitutes an adequate or reasonable justification for doing so?
For example, would it be reasonable for
the Minister to indicate that he is refusing to provide the specific grounds
for refusal because this would have adverse consequence for matters of State
security?
A recent case of Brophy Solicitors
highlights some of the problems. Our client has been refused Naturalization on
a number of occasions, each time without reason, despite the fact that our client appears to fulfil all of the necessary
requirements for naturalization in Section 15(1) of the Nationality and
Citizenship Act 1956. He is currently
awaiting the determination of his fourth application. In light of Mallak, we
wrote to thee Minister requesting that the grounds for the previous refusals be
provided to our client so that they can be addressed prior to the determination
of his current application. The Minister’s response was that it is a matter for
the Minister to determine what procedures would be applied in the
Naturalization process in accordance with the Mallak judgement. Thus, in
respect of this case, the Minister refused to provide the reasons for the
previous refusals for the reason that the Minister is not in a position to
divert resources towards previous applications.
It is of most concern to us that it
appears from this case that it is the Minister’s interpretation of the Supreme
Court’s reasoning in Malak that he can continue to refuse to provide applicants
with the grounds for refusal for reasons involving only administrative
difficulties such as “scarce resources”.
Brophy Solicitors
25.01.13
Our goal is to provide a superior level of professionalism and service to all our clients, helping them obtain pardons, US waivers and visas in a timely and efficient manner, so they can move on to live fulfilling, productive lives. Changes in Canadian laws and U.S. Homeland Security practices have made taking care of these tasks even more daunting and confusing than in years past. At Canada Pardon & US Waiver Experts, we take all the stress out of obtaining a Canadian pardon or a U.S. travel waiver, and even expedite the process wherever possible.
ReplyDeleteUS Waiver Form Canada