Friday, July 22, 2011

EU TREATY RIGHTS AND SHAM MARRAIGES

 MINISTER SHATTER'S RECENT STATEMENT ON SHAM MARRAIGES

The INIS press release of the 9th June 2011, entitled “Sham marriages leading to abuse of free movement rights ”  summarizes Minister Shatter’s recent speech to the Justice and Home Affairs Council in Luxemburg.  The Minister informed the Council of the “highly irregular” patterns of marriage. He indicated that his official were working on drafting amendments to the Immigration and Residence Bill to deal with the problem of “marriage of convenience”, and that this Bill would be re introduced shortly.

We very much welcome the fact that that the Minister proposes to take action against the fraudulent industry surrounding the EU Treaty Rights process.  We would agree with his position that the problem is significant and requires intervention by the State in the form of appropriate legislation. The current position is completely unsatisfactory in that it is not currently an offence to enter a fraudulent marriage for immigration purposes. This leaves the field wide open for abuse of the process, and frankly it is of no surprise that a fraudulent industry has flourished.

Since the case of Izmailovich v the Commissioner of an Garda Siochana, delivered on the 31st January 2011, the Government is fully on notice of this legal lacuna of the “marriage of convenience”. Mr Justice Hogan, who presided over the Izmailovich case, indicated in his judgement that he had no option but to find that the Gardai are not empowered to prevent the solemnisation of marriage on the grounds that they suspect, even with good reason, that the marriage is one of convenience because under current law the marriage would be valid. He summed up the position succinctly, and went so far as to call on the legislature to resolve the situation;

“I quiet appreciate that the decision in this case may present the authorities with very considerable difficulties in this problematic area. But, as I indicated at the hearing, if the law in this area is considered to be unsatisfactory then it is of course in principle open to the Oireachtas and if needs be the Union legislature to address these questions. As this decision in its own way illustrates, the problems encountered here are difficult once and present complex questions of public policy in relation to marriage and immigration. These, however, are ultimately policy questions which only the Oireachtas and again if needs be the Union legislature can resolve”

We too call on the Minister to take action in this area, as it is to the great disservice and frustration of all genuine applicants in the EU Treaty Rights process that the fraud is permitted to continue.

7 comments:

  1. I would like to see the leglisation first.

    In the past there was something suspicious in the way the Dept made so much
    drama and publicity about sham marriages, to impose draconian laws that where not
    needed. While not using already existing powers or even making fraud marriages a
    simple criminal offense. Dealing with the individual offenders instead of attacking
    everyone.

    What is a cause for concern is countries using the so called sham marriage
    allegation as a means of striping of a citizen’s rights, or use it as a form of
    collective punishment, or to cut down number of foreign national with rights to
    stay on grounds of familyhood.

    In Metock case , there was not one couple involved in marriage of convenience,
    yet still the Irish authority wanted to deprive them of their rights.

    There was never any veracity in the argument that the EU directive stops member
    states from fighting against marriages of convenience, as it doesn't.

    And here are the instructions from the EU Commission
    http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2009:0313:FIN:EN:PDF

    ReplyDelete
  2. The information you have shared with us is really so great, nice effort!! easyonlinepaydayloan.com

    ReplyDelete
  3. Keep on good working guys; you have done the great job! best cheap life insurance

    ReplyDelete
  4. Extremely energetic blog, I loved that a lot because of attracting info. car insurance

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks a lot guys, you have shared such a nice issue according to today’s world, nice try!! Mark Hurd

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi, thanks for your great information! Well, it really seems so great. payday loans in pomona ca

    ReplyDelete
  7. This wonderful post is in fact so interesting and comic, I really loved this. Thanks intended for sharing this information. dentist pediatric wheaton

    ReplyDelete